Watch The Velvet Underground with film summary and movie review

Be aware, though, that viewers who come into Hayne’s two-hour movie “The Velvet Underground” looking for a primer on the band, Lou Reed, John Cale, Nico, Andy Warhol, Mary Woronov, The Factory, and other famous names and locations may find themselves disoriented. Despite the presence of a lot of traditional documentary elements, and a mostly linear story that pulls you through approximately twenty years’ of cultural history, Haynes and his collaborators make the experience feel new and surprising, assembling the component parts with an eye towards making not just a movie, but an experience, something that you feel as you might feel the drums during a live music performances: in your gut. 

Interview subjects who were present at the time—including Velvet co-founder Cale, a Welsh classical musician; actress and painter Woronov; my colleague Amy Taubin, a veteran film critic; and the late Anthology Film Archives founder Jonas Mekas, who died not long after his interviews—offer commentary and insight, alternating between taking a detached “long view” of things and plunging us right into the middle of it all. (Taubin is particularly sharp when critiquing the sexism of the Factory, where women, including lead singer Nico, were prized for their striking good looks over all else.) 

Like another great 2021 music documentary, Questlove’s “Summer of Soul,” this movie appears to deliberately adopt the structure of a mid-twentieth century vinyl album—the kind with songs arranged in tracks that are intended to be experienced in a linear way, first Side A and then Side B, straight through, without stopping. Every few minutes, the editing shifts emphasis so that you’re just just switching musical tracks but intellectual tracks: as in railroads, as in “one-track mind,” or “train of thought.” Under Haynes’ supervision, cutters Affonso Gonçalves and Adam Kurnitz let the material flow and change direction and loop recursively back on itself, digress for a bit and then return to the main point. The effect is less like sitting in a classroom and having facts laid out for you than listening to Velvet Underground songs while perusing coffee table books or pictorial websites about the band and pondering connections between the music that the band was making and the events that were unfolding in the world around them. It’s a feedback loop of information that creates a cinematic equivalent of that hypnotic drone that flows beneath so many of the Velvet Underground’s songs, and that Cale insightfully tells us was modeled on the “60-cycle hum” of appliances and machines from that period in history, the understructure of modern life. 

There’s another thing happening here, involving overlapping dialogue and music cues and split-screen images, and it’s just as fascinating: Haynes seems to be trying to find a streaming-era equivalent to the multimedia sound-and-light shows that Warhol and his friends and “discoveries” used to stage around New York in the ’60s—the combination musical/dance/poetry/experimental cinema “happenings” that would comprise the Velvets performing a song, Haynes and cinematographer Ed Lachman light the present-day interviews in the manner of Warhol’s “close-up” films, with even-toned lighting and a solid-colored background, in an old fashioned “academy ratio” image that’s closer to a square than a rectangle. 

The effect evokes actual footage taken by Warhol and other Factory-adjacent filmmakers at the time, material that’s included here as well. All of it this treated as elements to be arranged in split-screen compositions that evoke Warhol’s “Chelsea Girls,” a quasi-documentary “experience” that is ideally presented in a movie theater where two 16mm film projectors can run simultaneously, casting two unrelated images side-by-side and letting the soundtracks overlap and become dissonant, a soup of dialogue and sound. (“I don’t have to listen to this shit,” a Los Angeles record producer told the band when they were recording 1968’s White Light/White Heat. “I’ll put it on record and I’m leaving. When you’re done, come and get me.”)

In addition to new and old material that’s directly relevant to the band (including early “music video” footage, and shots of them gallivanting in New York, Los Angeles and other locales), you also see images from filmmakers who either operated contemporaneously with the Factory or inspired them, from Warhol’s notorious static-shot “Empire” to fragments of (if my eye doesn’t deceive me!) Kenneth Anger’s “Scorpio Rising” and Maya Deren’s “Meshes of the Afternoon.” Sound and image don’t merely work together but at cross-purposes, creating a vibe more so than a straightforward narrative. Even when Haynes (who treated some of the same themes fictionally in his music drama “Velvet Goldmine”) is being sneakily conventional, verging on a public television-style, “let’s all appreciate this incredible thing that happened” mode, you always feel as if you’re being immersed in a kaleidoscope of impressions, associations, and anecdotes. They swirl across the screen like the multicolored lights that used to wash over the band during live performances at the Factory, often to the annoyance of Reed and Cale, who wanted their music to be central to the experience, even though they knew intellectually that it was but one part of a larger picture.

This is a dazzling film, and I’m deeply jealous of anyone who got to see it projected on a big screen, with booming sound, because that’s how it should be seen. It’s a spectacle as well as an account of a time and place. It makes you think about what a documentary is, and what film can do, even as it does all of the things that you want and need. 

In theaters today and on Apple TV on Friday, October 15th.