#This hi-fi speaker is meant to play loud

Tonality aside, the HDI-1600 has standout soundstage and imaging performance. It is particularly good at maintaining a stable ‘phantom center,’ that sweet illusion of having a singer or instrument float between the two speakers. The soundstage is not particularly wide, but width and ‘sharpness’ are often a tradeoff. I personally tend to lean towards something a bit wider, as is found in the L82, but the instrument separation and overall sense of realism on the HDI-1600 is excellent.

Lastly, the HDI-1600 perhaps differentiated itself most from competing speakers with its dynamics. Truth be told, I’m probably not even the ideal buyer for this speaker — it really shines at loud volumes when other bookshelf speakers start to struggle, and I very rarely listen all that loud.

It sounds just as good at reasonable SPLs, but the few times I decided to hazard annoying my neighbors, the speakers didn’t seem anywhere near straining — a likely benefit of the compression driver.

What the data says

Although I normally listen to speakers before putting it on the test bench, it’s worth noting that in the case of the HDI-1600, I had already seen some measurements for the speakers, so it’s possible my impressions were colored by those. Nonetheless, my listening impressions are backed up by my own measured data.

Below, you’ll see a kind of graph called a ‘spinorama,’ so-named because creating it involves rotating a speaker to capture its sound at 70 angles. This is important because what we hear in a speaker is not just the direct sound, but also the sound that bounces off our walls. Exceptional speakers will have a flattish direct sound, which changes smoothly as its performance is captured further off-axis.

The Spinorama summarizes a speaker’s on-axis and off-axis sound in one graph, helping us separate the good speakers from the bad ones. The HDI-1600 is a good one:

Explanations of how to interpret these lines are provided over at Speaker Data 2034 and Audioholics. Here’s my summary, which you can skip if you’ve already read this spiel:

• The On-Axis (Green) and Listening Window (White) curves represent the ‘direct’ sound of the speaker before any reflections, and they should be relatively flat. The On-Axis is measured with the speaker aimed directly at the microphone, while the Listening Window is an average of 9 measurements within a ±30° horizontal ±10° vertical window. This accounts for the fact most people don’t sit perfectly still or centered, so it is generally the more important of the two. As the first and loudest sounds to arrive at our ears, the direct sound has a huge impact on our perception of tonality.
• The rest of the curves focus on the indirect, or ‘off-axis’ sound — the sound that will reflect off your walls. The Early Reflections curve (blue, top) is particularly important, as it is an average of several angles that estimate the very first bounces off your walls, floor, and ceiling to reach your ears. These reflections contribute significantly to our impressions of tonality and soundstage (the latter being particularly affected by horizontal reflections).
• The ER curve should generally tilt down a few dB from 20Hz to 20kHz; how much will depend on the speaker’s directivity characteristics. The most important thing is that its shape roughly matches the direct sound, indicating the reflected sounds are similar in character to the direct sound.
• The Sound Power curve (red, top) represents an average of the speaker‘s sound in all directions. It’s not as useful as the other curves for speakers that mostly radiate sound forward, but it should generally look like an even steeper version of the ER curve.
• The Predicted In-Room Response curve (purple) estimates how a speaker will measure in a real room by combining data from the LW, ER, and SP curves. It is, in a way, a refinement of the ER curve. For the majority of speakers, the PIR curve looks very similar to the Early Reflections curve but tilting a tiny bit more, so it is often omitted.
• The Directivity Index (red, bottom) and Early Reflections DI (blue, bottom) curves tell us how similar the off-axis sound is to the direct sound. These are calculated by subtracting the Sound Power and Early Reflections curves from the Listening Window, respectively. Smooth DI curves suggest the off-axis and direct are similar, which bodes well for the soundstage. Good DI curves also imply a speaker will respond well to equalization.
• Though not a standard part of the Spinorama, the Horizontal ERDI curve (yellow) consists of only the horizontal component of the ERDI curve. This allows us to separate a speaker’s horizontal and vertical directivity, as the former is the most important for soundstage performance. This should be a smooth line.
• Bumps that persist through all the top curves are indications of resonances — artifacts that can adversely color the sound.
• You generally don’t have to worry about what happens above 10kHz, as most people can’t hear much up there and music tends to have little content in this region anyway.

The HDI-1600 demonstrates excellent performance throughout.

The on-axis and listening window curves trend towards flat, hinting at the neutral tonality I heard. Likewise, you can see the slightly elevated bass around 100Hz and a dip in the response between 9 kHz and 15 kHz, likely the cause for the slight lack of ‘sparkle’ I described. There is a slight scoop in the upper bass and lower mids, but I can’t say I noticed it in my room. Your mileage may vary.

Likewise, the predicted in-room response tilts down while maintaining a similar overall shape as the direct sound, suggesting that tonality is maintained listening in a typical living room setup, and while the ERDI curve gets a little jagged around 1-3kHz, the Horizontal ERDI remains smooth, predicting the impressive soundstage performance I mentioned earlier.

The spinorama tells us most of what we need to know, but I like to look more deeply at the horizontal performance. Here is the response from 0 to 90 degrees:

This is mostly excellent performance; we can see how the response shape mostly changes smoothly with each 10-degree increment.

For the speaker nerds, the gallery below includes a variety of other directivity measurements, mostly further breakdowns of horizontal and vertical directivity. In particular, not how well controlled most of the vertical directivity is, despite the speaker not using a coaxial driver.

JBL does it again

The HDI-1600 performed admirably in both listening and measured tests. At $1,800, its greatest problem is that audiophiles are already spoiled for choice in the $1000-2000 price bracket with such great options as the KEF R3 and LS50 Meta, Buchardt S400, Polk L200, and Focal Chora 806 offering worthy challenges.

But I’m not complaining — it’s a pretty great time to be an audio enthusiast. Though the aesthetics aren’t right for me, HDI-1600 stands out for its soundstage prowess, deep bass extension, and fantastic dynamics, and should be a particularly compelling option if you like to listen loud. If those are qualities you’re looking for in a speaker, the HDI-1600 should be near the top of your list.

Did you know we have a newsletter all about consumer tech? It’s called Plugged In –
and you can subscribe to it right here.

Published April 5, 2021 — 22:39 UTC