#Citizen Kane Wasn’t Always Seen As A Cinematic Classic
Table of Contents
“Citizen Kane Wasn’t Always Seen As A Cinematic Classic”
By his own admission, Kane doesn’t know how to run a newspaper; he just tries “everything he can think of,” and the same could be said of Welles as a first-time filmmaker. As Sidney Pollack observed: “Every shot [in ‘Citizen Kane’] has an idea. There’s a concept being executed at every second.” The film also heralded a new narrative style whereby the meaning of Kane’s life and his final word, “Rosebud” (a secret the audience alone is privy to), comes together piecemeal through flashbacks, newsreels, and multiple perspectives, as opposed to the standard omniscient third-person point of view.
Although Hearst made a concerted effort to bury the film, and succeeded in the short term, “Citizen Kane” eventually found its audience, leaving it vindicated by time. It continued to attract controversy, however, with the publication of Pauline Kael’s 1971 New Yorker essay “Raising Kane,” which renewed debate over the question of the film’s true authorship. In 2020, Gary Oldman, Charles Dance, and Tom Burke portrayed Mankiewicz, Hearst, and Welles, respectively, in David Fincher’s Oscar-nominated biopic, “Mank,” and by then, “Citizen Kane” was well-established as a classic.
If you liked the article, do not forget to share it with your friends. Follow us on Google News too, click on the star and choose us from your favorites.
For forums sites go to Forum.BuradaBiliyorum.Com
If you want to read more Like this articles, you can visit our Social Media category.