Former colleagues of Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, Twitter’s former cybersecurity chief who blew the whistle on the social media company for alleged lax enforcement of data privacy rules, say they have been offered payment in exchange for damaging information about him, according to published reports.

Tech employees at Zatko’s former stops including Stripe, Google and the Pentagon said their email inboxes and LinkedIn accounts have been inundated with messages from so-called research-and-advisory companies seeking to get information that could impact a potential acquisition of Twitter by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, The New Yorker reported Tuesday.

Research-and-advisory firms gather information for clients who then use the data to plan strategy relating to potential investments.

“I’m currently working on a project regarding leadership in tech, and my client is hoping to speak to an experienced professional about a particular individual you may have worked with,” read a message sent to Marty Wasserman, a Stripe employee, on Aug. 23.

Another Stripe worker, Dan Foster, told colleagues: “I’m getting inundated with paid interview requests.”

The two men were invited to a “45-60 minute compensated phone consultation.”

The messages were sent after Zatko went public with his claims against Twitter last month.

“Preeeettyy sure this is regarding Mudge,” Wasserman wrote to Stripe colleagues on the internal Slack channel.

“Hard pass.”

According to The New Yorker, Wasserman was asked by an associate at AlphaSights about information that could shed light on Zatko’s “personality, leadership, style, validity, and history.”

“We compensate well because we know this is a difficult and confusing ask at first,” the associated reportedly wrote to Wasserman.

Jaclyn Schoof, another Stripe employee, reported receiving the same offer from AlphaSights, an information services company headquartered in London.

“They said they didn’t care how much it would cost them… seems really weird,” she wrote to colleagues.

Wasserman told The New Yorker he was concerned “that multiple different sources, multiple different people, multiple different companies, were all basically trying to dig up dirt on Mudge, all seemingly at the same time.”

“My family and I are disturbed by what appears to be a campaign to approach our friends and former colleagues under apparently false pretenses with offers of money in exchange for information about us,” Zatko told The New Yorker.

“These tactics should be beneath whoever is behind them.” 

The New Yorker reported that none of the Stripe workers who were approached agreed to accept payment because they “wished to defend his credibility.”

Musk has cited Zatko’s accusations against Twitter as a legal rationale to back out of his $44 billion commitment to buy the social media company and take it private.

Twitter shareholders on Tuesday approved the buyout.

Twitter has sued Musk in Delaware in a bid to enforce the agreement. The trial is scheduled to begin next month.

On Twitter, Musk wondered which companies were seeking dirt on Zatko.

“Anyone know who the secret clients are? Let’s out them on Twitter rn haha,” Musk tweeted.

In testimony before Congress on Tuesday, Zatko said Twitter employed an undercover Chinese agent and that the site constituted a national security threat.

He said that Twitter did not know the alleged Chinese agent was on its payroll until the company was contacted by the FBI.

A Twitter spokesperson said in a statement to The Post: “Today’s hearing only confirms that Mr. Zatko’s allegations are riddled with inconsistencies and inaccuracies.”