#Tony Bobulinski’s evidence means media should push Biden to answer big questions

Journalists had a rare chance to ask Joe Biden a few questions Wednesday and — of course — failed to ask him anything about his knowledge of his son’s business dealings.

Even though former ally Tony Bobulinski gave sitdown interviews with Fox News and The Post’s Michael Goodwin outlining in detail his evidence disproving Joe’s repeated claims of lifelong ignorance of son Hunter’s profitable affairs.

And even though Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey was testifying to the Senate about the company’s censoring of stories about the Bidens. Two big developments that the press felt wasn’t worthy of mention.

What questions should media be asking Joe Biden, nonstop?

For starters: Why did you talk to Bobulinski — twice in 24 hours? Hunter introduced him as “the one who’s helping us with the business we’re doing with the Chinese” — how does that not debunk your claim that you never discussed that business with Hunter or your brother Jim?

What did you mean when you told Tony, “I trust you,” and, the next day, “Look out for my family”? Did it in fact have something to do with the 10 percent of the deal’s profits that the partners discussed reserving for “the big guy”?

No one in Biden’s family or campaign has denied that Joe was who the partners meant by “the big guy.” They merely issue blanket condemnations of The Post’s reporting on these scandals.

Bobulinski has e-mails, texts, photos, witnesses, receipts and other documents to back up his claims. He’s shared everything with the FBI and Senate investigators.

He stepped up after the likes of Rep. Adam Schiff and various media ostriches and Big Tech would-be censors suggested The Post’s exposés from Hunter’s laptop were really nothing but Russian disinformation. He also notes that no one from Facebook or Twitter has reached out to check his claims and The Post’s reporting, even though both social-media companies have actively suppressed the damning-to-Joe-Biden news.

Bobulinski emphasizes that the Biden group recruited him to start the China deal back in 2015, while Joe was still vice president — and that Hunter said the Chinese already owed the Biden family tens of millions at that point.

And of course Hunter’s and Jim’s merchandizing of Joe’s influence goes back decades, involving far more that Hunter’s lucrative payments from Burisma.

Which leads to a few more questions for Joe Biden: How can you claim you didn’t know that, for decades, Jim and Hunter traded on promises they could influence you? Or that, after you became vice president, they took that sleaze global? Are you so ignorant of how things work that you really believed they earned millions in fields where they had zero expertise, when their only asset was . . . you?

If Joe Biden had answers to any of this, he’d surely speak up. Instead, it looks like he’ll keep dodging through Election Day — and, shockingly, he can count on his allies in the press and Big Tech to keep the scandal as low-profile as possible.

It’s a disinformation campaign, all right — to protect Biden.