#Racialized US policing: the evidence is ample
“#Racialized US policing: the evidence is ample”
Fair enough. But it is a serious mistake to dismiss stark, widely documented racial disparities in policing as a statistical mirage with no implications for equality under the law.
Sometimes, those disparities result from race-neutral policies. When police concentrate their resources in high-crime, low-income neighborhoods, for instance, they may impose disproportionate burdens on the people they are trying to help.
New York City’s stop-question-and-frisk program, which at its peak in 2011 involved nearly 700,000 encounters between cops and pedestrians, was supposed to get guns off the street and curb violent crime. But nine times out of 10, those stops didn’t yield an arrest or even a summons, although each of them was supposedly based on “reasonable suspicion” of criminal activity.
Half the stops included pat-downs, ostensibly based on reasonable suspicion that the person was armed. Yet the searches almost never discovered guns and rarely found weapons of any sort.
When 9 out of 10 people subjected to such treatment, sometimes repeatedly, happen to be black or Hispanic, that pattern is troubling, regardless of the policy’s intent. Ditto for when blacks are nearly four times as likely as whites to be arrested for marijuana possession, even though they are only slightly more likely to be cannabis consumers. And likewise, an irrational legal distinction between the smoked and snorted forms of cocaine — a distinction initially supported by African-American politicians — means black defendants get substantially longer sentences than white defendants for essentially the same offense.
Other disparities are harder to explain. Among people who reported police encounters in a nationwide survey by the Bureau of Justice Statistics, blacks were 2.5 times as likely as whites to report that the officers had used or threatened force.
One study after another has found that black drivers are much more likely than white drivers to be searched during routine traffic stops, and those searches are less likely to discover contraband. That suggests racial bias, conscious or not, plays a role in deciding who seems suspicious.
In a 2016 speech, Tim Scott, the only black Republican in the Senate, explained what such disparities mean in practice, noting that he had been stopped by police seven times in a single year. “The vast majority of the time,” he said, “I was pulled over for nothing more than driving a new car in the wrong neighborhood or some other reason just as trivial.”
Scott has even been hassled by Capitol Hill police officers who thought he seemed out of place, notwithstanding the pin identifying him as a senator. He described a former staffer who was so tired of being mistaken for a car thief by DC cops that he traded in his Chrysler 300 for a less conspicuous model.
By the time he retired from the US Navy after a 20-year military career, Theodore Johnson recalls in a National Review essay, he had been pulled over about 40 times, including one occasion during college when he spent a night in jail because his driver’s license had recently expired. The cops stopped him because they assumed his cigar was packed with marijuana.
“Imagine the frustration, the irritation, the sense of a loss of dignity that accompanies each of those stops,” Scott said. “I do not know many African-American men who do not have a very similar story to tell.”
That story provides crucial context for the anger provoked by Floyd’s death. One needn’t believe that every cop is a bigot, or that American society is irredeemably racist, to recognize that the problem goes beyond a few “bad apples.”
Twitter: @JacobSullum
If you want to read more Opinion News articles, you can visit our General category.
if you want to watch Movies or Tv Shows go to Dizi.BuradaBiliyorum.Com for forums sites go to Forum.BuradaBiliyorum.Com
